I woke up this morning to the headline that the Government
was shut down. Funding for the government has run out and non-essential people
have been sent home with out pay. I wonder how that feels to be declared
non-essential. Does this mean that these people are not needed? Some in
congress might think so but then some of us might think that about congress.
It is more of a government slowdown than a shut down and I
can understand the frustrations on both sides of congress. Perhaps congress
should work without pay during this time. I would say that they are
non-essentials but they are the only ones who can deal with the issue. That
leaves the rest of us dealing with the children in congress crying “It’s not my
fault.” when in fact it is all their faults.
My opinion is that a bill in congress should focus on only
the item at hand and not be weighed down with extraneous issues. I wonder how
long the federal government can operate with non-essentials staying at home; this
problem will not end with this one item being fixed because one side or another
will do the same thing with the next item coming up.
You're exactly right, Pastor. This won't be the end of their bickering.
ReplyDelete